Know the key difference between Appeal vs Review vs Revision under CrPC & BNSS. Clear legal comparison with examples, sections & expert insights.
In the Indian criminal justice system, three important legal remedies – Appeal, Review, and Revisionβprovide mechanisms to check judicial errors and ensure justice. While these terms may appear similar, their purposes, procedures, and scopes are distinct. This blog explores the difference between appeal, review and revision in criminal law, with a specific focus on their applicability under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
π Introduction
Understanding the difference between appeal, review and revision under CrPC and BNSS is crucial for legal practitioners, law students, and anyone involved in litigation. Each of these remedies serves a different function and is governed by separate provisions within procedural law.
Appeal vs Review vs Revision under CrPC & BNSS Explained
Let’s break down the core concepts and distinctions of Appeal vs Review vs Revision under CrPC & BNSS:
βοΈ What is an Appeal?
An appeal is a statutory right that allows a party to approach a higher court for a re-examination of a decision rendered by a lower court.
Key Features of Appeal:
-
Nature: A substantive statutory right.
-
Purpose: Re-hearing of the case in whole or part.
-
Scope: Both questions of fact and law can be re-evaluated.
-
Who Can File: Aggrieved party (accused or prosecution).
-
Time-bound: Must be filed within prescribed limitation.
Relevant Provisions:
-
Under CrPC: Sections 372 to 394.
-
Under BNSS: Sections 478 to 500.
Example:
If a Sessions Court convicts an accused, he may file an appeal in the High Court under Section 374 CrPC or its corresponding provision in BNSS.
π What is a Review?
A review is a reconsideration of a judgment by the same court that passed it, generally on the grounds of an error apparent on the face of the record.
Key Features of Review:
-
Nature: Exceptional and discretionary.
-
Purpose: Correction of manifest errors.
-
Scope: Limited to apparent errors, not re-argument.
-
Who Can File: Party affected by the order/judgment.
-
Jurisdiction: Same court that passed the order.
Relevant Provisions:
-
Under CrPC: No express provision for review by criminal courts; however, the Supreme Court and High Courts may exercise review powers under the Constitution (Article 137 for SC).
-
Under BNSS: Similar position continues; review remains limited.
Example:
A review petition may be entertained by the Supreme Court under Article 137 if there is a glaring mistake in its earlier judgment.
π What is Revision?
A revision is a supervisory power of higher courts to examine the correctness, legality, or propriety of any order passed by a lower court.
Key Features of Revision:
-
Nature: Discretionary, not a right.
-
Purpose: To prevent miscarriage of justice.
-
Scope: Limited to jurisdictional and legal errors.
-
Who Can File: Either party or suo motu by the court.
-
Jurisdiction: High Court or Sessions Judge.
Relevant Provisions:
-
Under CrPC: Sections 397 to 405.
-
Under BNSS: Sections 472 to 477.
Example:
If a Magistrate erroneously drops proceedings in a criminal case, the complainant may move the High Court under Section 397 CrPC or the corresponding BNSS provision for revision.
π Comparative Table: Difference Between Appeal, Review and Revision
Basis | Appeal | Review | Revision |
---|---|---|---|
Definition | Re-hearing by higher court | Reconsideration by same court | Supervisory jurisdiction by higher court |
Nature | Statutory right | Discretionary | Discretionary |
Scope | Questions of fact and law | Errors apparent on record only | Jurisdictional/legal correctness |
Governing Law (CrPC) | Sec. 372β394 | No specific provision | Sec. 397β405 |
Governing Law (BNSS) | Sec. 478β500 | No material change from CrPC | Sec. 472β477 |
Court Involved | Appellate Court | Same Court | High Court/Sessions Judge |
Remedy Available To | Aggrieved parties | Parties affected by judgment | Either party or suo motu |
π§ Key Differences Under CrPC vs BNSS
While the BNSS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) aims to modernize criminal procedure, the difference between appeal, review and revision under CrPC and BNSS remains substantively the same.
Highlights:
-
Appeal and Revision provisions have been renumbered, not fundamentally altered.
-
Review continues to remain outside the express domain of subordinate criminal courts.
-
Terminologies and procedures in BNSS are updated for clarity but not for radical change.
π Why Knowing the Difference Matters
Misunderstanding these concepts can lead to procedural errors, dismissal of cases, or loss of remedies. Proper use of appeal, review, or revision ensures that justice is not denied due to technicalities.
β Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: Can a review be filed against a High Court judgment under CrPC?
No, CrPC does not provide for review by High Courts, but constitutional review under Article 226/227 or Article 137 (in case of the Supreme Court) may be possible.
Q2: Is appeal a matter of right in criminal cases?
Yes, in certain situations like conviction by Sessions Court. However, appeals against acquittal or certain interlocutory orders are limited.
Q3: What is the difference between appeal review and revision under BNSS?
Under BNSS, the definitions and functions remain almost identical to CrPC. The renumbering of sections and procedural clarity are the main updates.
π Conclusion
To summarise, the difference between appeal review and revision under CrPC and BNSS lies in their purpose, procedure, scope, and jurisdiction.
-
Appeal is a right to be heard again.
-
Review is a correction mechanism within the same court.
-
Revision is a supervisory tool to uphold the legality of proceedings.
Understanding and correctly applying these remedies strengthens the legal process and protects the rights of litigants in criminal proceedings.
π©Β Need help?Β Lawfluencers can be contacted atΒ hello@lawfluencers.com for any specific legal concerns or personalized legal consultations.
Related Reads:
This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.