Learn how “acquired distinctiveness” can transform a non-distinctive trademark into a recognizable brand. Discover the steps needed to prove it, key legal principles, and case laws in trademark registration.
When applying for trademark registration, one of the primary concerns for the applicant is to ensure that the mark is distinctive enough to differentiate their goods or services from those of others. However, not all trademarks are inherently distinctive. Some trademarks, which are initially considered generic, descriptive, or non-distinctive, can still be registered if they have acquired distinctiveness over time. This concept, known as acquired distinctiveness, is a critical principle in trademark law worldwide.
What is Acquired Distinctiveness?
Acquired distinctiveness, also referred to as secondary meaning, occurs when a mark that is otherwise non-distinctive becomes associated with a particular product or service in the minds of consumers. Over time, through extensive use, advertising, and market recognition, the mark transitions from a descriptive or generic term to one that is distinctly linked with the trademark owner’s goods or services.
For example, a descriptive mark like “Best Bakes” may not be eligible for registration initially because it describes the quality of baked goods. However, if the company uses “Best Bakes” for a significant period and heavily promotes it, consumers may start to recognize the term specifically as indicating products from that company, thus gaining acquired distinctiveness.
Legal Framework for Acquired Distinctiveness in India
In India, the concept of acquired distinctiveness is addressed under Section 9(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which deals with absolute grounds for refusal of trademark registration. If a trademark is not inherently distinctive, the applicant may still get it registered by proving that it has acquired distinctiveness over time under Section 9(1) proviso.
Section 9(1)(b) specifically states that a trademark that is descriptive or lacks distinctiveness can be registered if it has “acquired distinctiveness or secondary meaning.” The applicant bears the responsibility of proving that the mark has become associated with their goods or services and is recognized as such by the public.
How to Prove Acquired Distinctiveness?
Proving acquired distinctiveness is not an easy task. The applicant must demonstrate that the mark has become synonymous with their product or service in the minds of consumers. Below are some key elements used to establish acquired distinctiveness:
1. Duration and Extent of Use
One of the primary factors is the duration and consistency of the mark’s use. A mark that has been in continuous use for a long period is more likely to have acquired distinctiveness. The longer the period of use, the stronger the case for proving that the mark is associated with the applicant.
Case Reference: In the case of Godfrey Phillips India Ltd. v. Girnar Food & Beverages (P) Ltd., the court held that extensive use of a non-distinctive trademark over a significant period could result in the mark acquiring distinctiveness.
2. Sales and Market Share
Sales figures and market share data can provide strong evidence of acquired distinctiveness. If a significant portion of the market identifies the product or service with the trademark in question, it demonstrates consumer association with the brand.
Case Reference: In Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. Reckitt Benckiser India Ltd., market share and sales figures played a crucial role in proving that a descriptive mark had acquired distinctiveness.
3. Extent of Advertising and Promotion
Heavy advertising and marketing campaigns can help establish acquired distinctiveness. If a business has spent significant amounts on promoting the trademark and making it known to consumers, it strengthens the case for proving acquired distinctiveness. Advertisements that focus on the association between the mark and the goods or services can demonstrate consumer recognition.
Case Reference: The case of Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta highlighted that sustained advertising and marketing can create a secondary meaning for a trademark.
4. Consumer Surveys
Consumer surveys are commonly used in trademark disputes to prove acquired distinctiveness. These surveys show that a significant portion of the public associates the mark with the product or service offered by the trademark owner. Such surveys must be carefully designed and conducted to ensure that they provide credible and reliable evidence.
Case Reference: In ITC Ltd. v. Nestle India Ltd., consumer surveys were used to demonstrate that the term “Magic Masala” had acquired distinctiveness, despite being descriptive.
5. Evidence of Exclusivity
The applicant can also present evidence of exclusivity in the use of the mark. If no other competitors use the same or a similar mark, it strengthens the argument that the trademark is distinctive to the applicant’s goods or services. It also helps to demonstrate that the mark has acquired secondary meaning.
6. Recognition by Trade Circles
If the trademark is well-recognized within the trade circles or industry, it may help to prove that the mark has acquired distinctiveness. For example, endorsements or mentions by industry experts, trade publications, or awards recognizing the trademark can bolster the case.
Case Reference: In the case of Tata Sons Ltd. v. Manu Kosuri & Ors, the court held that recognition of the trademark by the trade circles was an important factor in proving acquired distinctiveness.
Global Approach to Acquired Distinctiveness
Countries worldwide recognize the principle of acquired distinctiveness in trademark law. For instance, in the United States, Section 2(f) of the Lanham Act provides a similar pathway to register descriptive or generic marks that have gained secondary meaning. The European Union Trademark Regulation under Article 7(3) also allows for the registration of marks that have acquired distinctive character through use.
Case Reference: In the landmark case of Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd. v. Sterling-Winthrop Group Ltd., the UK courts highlighted that descriptive words can acquire secondary meaning if they have been extensively used in the market and are recognized by consumers as denoting goods from a specific source.
Conclusion
Acquired distinctiveness plays a crucial role in trademark law, allowing businesses to secure registration for marks that may not have been inherently distinctive at the outset. To prove acquired distinctiveness, it is essential to provide substantial evidence, including long-term use, sales data, advertising efforts, consumer surveys, and recognition by the public or trade circles. Properly demonstrating these elements can make the difference between a successful and unsuccessful trademark application.
By understanding and leveraging acquired distinctiveness, businesses can ensure the protection of their brands and maintain a competitive edge in the marketplace.
…
Need help? Lawfluencers can be contacted at hello@lawfluencers.com!
Join our social media community at linktr.ee/lawfluencers to stay updated on the latest trends, laws, and regulations shaping the digital economy.